If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. https://crowell-powell.thoughtlanes.net/how-to-prevent-electromagnetic-fields-making-use-of-clothes-1679966544 for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. how to protect your body from 5g has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. how to protect yourself from 5g towers is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.